Plug-and-Play Benchmarking of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Large-Scale Flow Control
Reinforcement learning ({RL}) has shown promising results in active flow control ({AFC}), yet progress in the field remains difficult to assess as existing studies rely on heterogeneous observation and actuation schemes, numerical setups, and evaluation protocols. Current {AFC} benchmarks attempt to address these issues but heavily rely on external computational fluid dynamics ({CFD}) solvers, are not fully differentiable, and provide limited 3D and multi-agent support. To overcome these limitations, we introduce {FluidGym}, the first standalone, fully differentiable benchmark suite for {RL} in {AFC}. Built entirely in {PyTorch} on top of the {GPU}-accelerated {PICT} solver, {FluidGym} runs in a single Python stack, requires no external {CFD} software, and provides standardized evaluation protocols. We present baseline results with {PPO} and {SAC} and release all environments, datasets, and trained models as public resources. {FluidGym} enables systematic comparison of control methods, establishes a scalable foundation for future research in learning-based flow control, and is available at https://github.com/safe-autonomous-systems/fluidgym.
- Published in:
arXiv - Type:
Article - Authors:
- Year:
2026 - Source:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15015
Citation information
: Plug-and-Play Benchmarking of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Large-Scale Flow Control, arXiv, 2026, {arXiv}:2601.15015, January, http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15015, Becktepe.etal.2026a,
@Article{Becktepe.etal.2026a,
author={Becktepe, Jannis; Franz, Aleksandra; Thuerey, Nils; Peitz, Sebastian},
title={Plug-and-Play Benchmarking of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Large-Scale Flow Control},
journal={arXiv},
number={{arXiv}:2601.15015},
month={January},
url={http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15015},
year={2026},
abstract={Reinforcement learning ({RL}) has shown promising results in active flow control ({AFC}), yet progress in the field remains difficult to assess as existing studies rely on heterogeneous observation and actuation schemes, numerical setups, and evaluation protocols. Current {AFC} benchmarks attempt to address these issues but heavily rely on external computational fluid dynamics ({CFD}) solvers,...}}