Multi-Modal Vision vs. Text-Based Parsing: Benchmarking {LLM} Strategies for Invoice Processing

This paper benchmarks eight multi-modal large language models from three families ({GPT}-5, Gemini 2.5, and open-source Gemma 3) on three diverse openly available invoice document datasets using zero-shot prompting. We compare two processing strategies: direct image processing using multi-modal capabilities and a structured parsing approach converting documents to markdown first. Results show native image processing generally outperforms structured approaches, with performance varying across model types and document characteristics. This benchmark provides insights for selecting appropriate models and processing strategies for automated document systems. Our code is available online.

  • Veröffentlicht in:
    2025 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)
  • Typ:
    Inproceedings
  • Autoren:
    Berghaus, David; Berger, Armin; Hillebrand, Lars; Cvejoski, Kostadin; Sifa, Rafet
  • Jahr:
    2025
  • Source:
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04469

Informationen zur Zitierung

Berghaus, David; Berger, Armin; Hillebrand, Lars; Cvejoski, Kostadin; Sifa, Rafet: Multi-Modal Vision vs. Text-Based Parsing: Benchmarking {LLM} Strategies for Invoice Processing, 2025 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), 2025, {arXiv}:2509.04469, August, {arXiv}, http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04469, Berghaus.etal.2025b,

Assoziierte Lamarr-ForscherInnen

Prof. Dr. Rafet Sifa

Prof. Dr. Rafet Sifa

Principal Investigator Hybrides ML zum Profil
Photo. Portrait of David Berghaus.

Dr. David Berghaus

Postdoctoral Researcher NLP zum Profil