{"id":32687,"date":"2026-01-21T17:02:26","date_gmt":"2026-01-21T17:02:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lamarr-institute.org\/publication\/comment-on-logins-on-the-connection-between-normative-explanatory-reasons-and-normative-reasoning-reasons\/"},"modified":"2026-09-17T11:25:30","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T11:25:30","slug":"comment-on-logins-on-the-connection-between-normative-explanatory-reasons-and-normative-reasoning-reasons","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/lamarr-institute.org\/de\/publication\/comment-on-logins-on-the-connection-between-normative-explanatory-reasons-and-normative-reasoning-reasons\/","title":{"rendered":"Comment on Logins \u2013 On the Connection between Normative Explanatory Reasons and Normative Reasoning Reasons"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The comment starts with a brief exposition of the Eroteric View put forth by Art\u016brs Logins. I then provide one friendly comment on the exact form of the normative question which is central to the view, and suggest that in addition to the question, \u2018Why ought S to \u03c6 ?\u2019, Logins should take the question, \u2018Why is S permitted to \u03c6?\u2019 as definitive of normative reasons. In a more critical comment, I reflect on how normative explanatory reasons and normative reasoning reasons relate, calling into question Logins\u2019s claim that the two kinds of reasons are fundamentally distinct. First, I argue that being a normative explanatory reason near enough guarantees being a normative reasoning reason; second, I argue that normative explanatory reasons as well as normative reasoning reasons can be weighed, and that they can be weighed against each other. But this causes trouble for the Eroteric View.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The comment starts with a brief exposition of the Eroteric View put forth by Art\u016brs Logins. I then provide one friendly comment on the exact form of the normative question which is central to the view, and suggest that in addition to the question, \u2018Why ought S to \u03c6 ?\u2019, Logins should take the question, \u2018Why is S permitted to \u03c6?\u2019 as definitive of normative reasons. In a more critical [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"publication-type":[30],"class_list":["post-32687","publication","type-publication","status-publish","hentry","publication-type-article"],"acf":[],"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lamarr-institute.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/32687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lamarr-institute.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lamarr-institute.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publication"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lamarr-institute.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lamarr-institute.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/32687\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lamarr-institute.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publication-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lamarr-institute.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication-type?post=32687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}